In a way, I agree with how the Athenians acted because it is almost irrefutable to say that the weak could overcome those stronger then them in a psychical stand point. Technically, the stronger should have more power since there is no one to stand in there way. Yet, over centuries there have been many examples to prove this statement wrong in the sense of politics and culture.
I believe that in many cases the stronger should have power in order to ensure productivity, as long as no one is harmed in the process due to size or beliefs. There is a democratic and humane way to execute power despite size. Though, if threatened individuals are guaranteed the right to fight back and retaliate, much like the Melians.
There are endless ways to defend each point of view, but in the end, power is equipped with a set of morals, boundaries and questioning of character. Such as do "rights" really exist? If they do, who has the authority to give them if a higher power is out of the question? It is a question of culture as well as restraint to act out against others because of behavior.
To conclude, there is no correct answer, none the less an answer at all, to which morals are correct or appropriate. Ideas and other politically correct statements will continue to be examined for years to come.
Alex, you write: "...but in the end, power is equipped with a set of morals, boundaries and questioning of character" but also write there is no answer. This is confusing. Is there something outside of a powerful group that they should follow when making a decisions or are they free to do what they want? Did the Athenians behave okay or not?
ReplyDeleteYou also note that people have stood in the way of people with power. Sure. Aren't you talking about people who are trying to get more power so they can overcome others with power? Isn't the sad truth of the matter is those in charge set the rules, regardless of who it is in charge?